# eIP 41 LDO RAI MIM FRAX COMP AAVE SNX BAL BUSD CRV 1INCH YFI

**URL:** https://forum.euler.finance/t/eip-41-ldo-rai-mim-frax-comp-aave-snx-bal-busd-crv-1inch-yfi/554
**Category:** Protocol
**Created:** [December 20, 2022, 9:55am UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/eip-41-ldo-rai-mim-frax-comp-aave-snx-bal-busd-crv-1inch-yfi/554 "2022-12-20T09:55:40Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nikita](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a8b319/32.png) [@nikita](https://forum.euler.finance/u/nikita)
#### Post date: [January 4, 2023, 11:45pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/eip-41-ldo-rai-mim-frax-comp-aave-snx-bal-busd-crv-1inch-yfi/554/11 "2023-01-04T23:45:45Z")

</div>

Unless there’re no borrow caps, it seems that not all assets have enough liquidity for BF increasing. I think we shouldn’t sacrifice security for capital efficiency  
To accept this eIP, Euler Protocol have to implement borrow caps =\> raising BF.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.euler.finance/t/eip-41-ldo-rai-mim-frax-comp-aave-snx-bal-busd-crv-1inch-yfi/554)._