# \[Gauntlet\] Offboard Low Demand Tokens from Euler L2s

**URL:** <https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792>\
**Category:** Markets\
**Created:** [January 14, 2026, 3:14am UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792 "2026-01-14T03:14:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gauntlet](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/forum.euler.finance/gauntlet/32/611_2.png) [@Gauntlet](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Gauntlet)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2026, 3:14am UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/1 "2026-01-14T03:14:47Z")

</div>

# Summary

This proposal recommends offboarding the following assets from Unichain, Base, Arbitrum, and Linea across Euler due to low demand i.e. less than 100K in supply volume.

**Unichain** :

UNI, ezETH, rsETH, PT-cUSD-29JAN2026-(ETH)

**Base** :

EURC, USDS, ezETH, rETH, sUSDS, USD₮0, wsuperOETHb

**Arbitrum** :

syrupUSDC, weETH, PT-thBILL-27NOV2025, sUSDC, sUSDS, ARB, sUSDe, rETH, ezETH, sUSDC, rsETH, thBILL, wstUSR, sUSDS, USDe

**Linea** :

wrsETH, ezETH

# Supply

## Euler Unichain

| **Asset** | **Total Supply ($)** |
| --- | --- |
| UNI | 17,410.74 |
| ezETH | 6,526.36 |
| rsETH | 0.13 |
| PT-cUSD-29JAN2026-(ETH) | 0.00 |

## Euler Base

| **Asset** | **Total Supply ($)** |
| --- | --- |
| EURC | 52,230.47 |
| USDS | 41,947.31 |
| ezETH | 32,069.14 |
| rETH | 9,746.07 |
| sUSDS | 2,346.01 |
| USD₮0 | 6.33 |
| wsuperOETHb | 0.00 |

## Euler Arbitrum

| **Asset** | **Total Supply ($)** |
| --- | --- |
| syrupUSDC | 64,394.79 |
| weETH | 28,514.15 |
| PT-thBILL-27NOV2025 | 23,626.91 |
| sUSDC | 16,403.15 |
| sUSDS | 7,393.83 |
| ARB | 6,630.71 |
| sUSDe | 2,468.23 |
| rETH | 1,410.60 |
| ezETH | 387.55 |
| sUSDC | 253.66 |
| rsETH | 247.48 |
| thBILL | 95.82 |
| wstUSR | 50.33 |
| sUSDS | 10.02 |
| USDe | 0.00 |

## Euler Linea

| **Asset** | **Total Supply ($)** |
| --- | --- |
| wrsETH | 3,487.93 |
| ezETH | 1,251.07 |

# Offboarding Process

We recommend the following offboarding process:

- Set supply caps to 100K
- Ramp down LTVs to 0 over 30 days
- Inform users about the offboarding on public channels
- Once the ramping period is over, remove the vaults from the UI

# Next Steps

- We welcome community feedback

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Koursk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/4af34b/32.png) [@Koursk](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Koursk)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2026, 10:38am UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/4 "2026-01-25T10:38:26Z")

</div>

Hello,

Offboarding some of these token will hurt the protocol, in my opinion.

Once the offboarding starts, funds may still be present at the end of the ramping (lend & borrow)  
How will borrowers may still able to reimburse funds if it disappears from market? How will lenders be able to withdraw funds if they cannot know the liquidity available for withdrawal?

Regards

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wandererinasuit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/cab0a1/32.png) [@Wandererinasuit](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Wandererinasuit)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2026, 1:45pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/5 "2026-01-25T13:45:04Z")

</div>

If certain funds are to be off-boarded, all outstanding debt positions shall be closed. Otherwise borrower will never have the incentive to repay their position if they have enough funds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wandererinasuit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/cab0a1/32.png) [@Wandererinasuit](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Wandererinasuit)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2026, 1:47pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/6 "2026-01-25T13:47:20Z")

</div>

Personally, I’m referring to EURC, but no user shall be hurt by such incidents. Not saying protocol shall bail-out users, but that open debt positions must be closed. If those vaults disappear from the UI, how should not tech-savvy users ever get their funds back

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wandererinasuit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/cab0a1/32.png) [@Wandererinasuit](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Wandererinasuit)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2026, 9:01am UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/7 "2026-01-26T09:01:15Z")

</div>

Propose increasing the interest rates beyond the current 40% and to expedite the reduction of LTV thresholds to expedite the process.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Harpocryptes](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/forum.euler.finance/harpocryptes/32/367_2.png) [@Harpocryptes](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Harpocryptes)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2026, 9:19am UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/8 "2026-01-26T09:19:10Z")

</div>

For a proposal like this, I think it would be good to at least provide some reasoning _why_ this would be good for the protocol. Ideally, a list of pros and cons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gauntlet](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/forum.euler.finance/gauntlet/32/611_2.png) [@Gauntlet](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Gauntlet)\
**Post date:** [January 26, 2026, 3:25pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/9 "2026-01-26T15:25:32Z")

</div>

To clarify how the offboarding process works: borrowers can still repay and lenders can still withdraw throughout the wind-down. The parameter changes (LTV ramping to 0, reduced caps) prevent new borrowing while existing positions unwind naturally. Vaults remain functional in the UI during the offboarding process. The gradual LTV reduction creates an incentive for borrowers to close positions over time.

These markets have minimal utilization but still require monitoring and carry tail risk. Offboarding the proposed assets improves capital efficiency and reduces the protocol’s risk surface.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Koursk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/4af34b/32.png) [@Koursk](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Koursk)\
**Post date:** [January 27, 2026, 2:30pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/gauntlet-offboard-low-demand-tokens-from-euler-l2s/1792/10 "2026-01-27T14:30:52Z")

</div>

Thanks for your feedbacks.
