RFC Formalizing Multichain Deployment Process

[knightsemplar]

Thanks Bobbay and Matt. Definitely need some structure in on this aspect.

Agree with my man @AliG :

@AliG

Also, overall its focused on engineering viability (rightfully so) but doesnt ask questions about market viability. Only place that market viability (from euler’s perspective) can come thru in the “Rationale” section. Should we define its own place & ask specific questions from our perspective? (eg: security consideration sub questions. but for money&liquidity) Given Euler is a money market i feel we can request some attention there too.

This is super important. What’s the strategy for deploying on X? I don’t think Euler should be a copy pasta on each chain. As I mentioned before there should be something more specific, targeting specific assets on each. Oracles and liquidity will play a role.

Something akin to what @seraphim was saying here would work well. I would also be a fan of having some form of localised governance for each chain including the POC mentioned above. The POC should be a local rep from the chain/layer 2 in question. But this is a little outside the scope of this proposal.

In sum, it would be good to have an additional section on Deployment Strategy potentially after the Rationale section. It will then encourage discussions on this topic in the RFC.