# \[RFC\]: Rethinking the EUL distribution

**URL:** <https://forum.euler.finance/t/rfc-rethinking-the-eul-distribution/436>\
**Category:** Archive\
**Tags:** chainlink, eul, eul-distribution\
**Created:** [October 20, 2022, 3:08pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/rfc-rethinking-the-eul-distribution/436 "2022-10-20T15:08:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![knightsemplar](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/forum.euler.finance/knightsemplar/32/322_2.png) [@knightsemplar](https://forum.euler.finance/u/knightsemplar)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2022, 10:54am UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/rfc-rethinking-the-eul-distribution/436/17 "2022-11-03T10:54:34Z")

</div>

Re: the updated 80/20 suggestion: I think focusing on the core assets is a good way to do things for now.

As mentioned, this should free up some EUL that can then take place in governance votes, which is very positive.

Ultimately, this isn’t a perfect solution but a net positive step until EulerSwap is launched and a new system can be put in place.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.euler.finance/t/rfc-rethinking-the-eul-distribution/436)._