# Safety Module and EUL Staking

**URL:** <https://forum.euler.finance/t/safety-module-and-eul-staking/493>\
**Category:** Archive\
**Tags:** eul\
**Created:** [November 21, 2022, 1:58pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/safety-module-and-eul-staking/493 "2022-11-21T13:58:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shippooor](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex007/user_avatar/forum.euler.finance/shippooor/32/255_2.png) [@Shippooor](https://forum.euler.finance/u/Shippooor)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2022, 11:07pm UTC](https://forum.euler.finance/t/safety-module-and-eul-staking/493/10 "2022-12-01T23:07:19Z")

</div>

To echo what @maxholloway and @Millie said I doubt that a staking module is an effective measure to backstop insolvencies. Accumulating large stablecoin reserves is by far the best defence against such an event.

I agree that a Balancer pool type staking module like Aave could have the added benefit of increasing EUL liquidity. But I would argue that it is probably not the best use of the team time to focus on this when other options like [adding EUL liquidity directly](https://forum.euler.finance/t/rfc-increase-eul-liquidity-on-uniswap/504) might be simpler and just as effective.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.euler.finance/t/safety-module-and-eul-staking/493)._