eIP 39: Promote LUSD to Cross Tier
Voted Yes: DAOstewards have conducted an internal risk assessment and concluded that LUSD is a good fit as a cross-chain asset.
highlighted response of DAOstewards on the proposal
eIP 40: Schedule rolling monthly oracle change discussions & votes
Voted: yes
DAOstewards believe scheduling Oracle updates and bundling them together could reduce voter apathy.
eIP41: increase-borrow-factors-for-ldo-rai-mim-frax-comp-aave-snx-bal-busd-crv-1inch-yfi-snx
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Increasing BF of said assets will boost utilisation of Euler Pools
eIP 44: Fast-track - Convert FTT reserves to ETH
Vote: NO
Rationale: According to our evaluation, this proposal shouldnât be considered as an emergency proposal. No DAO funds are at Risk; the value of said tokens are $15K at the time of publishing the proposal. If not executed proposal the DAO is opening doors to many front-running opportunities.
eIP 43 : Allow âabstainâ vote
Vote: Didnt vote (Abstain)
Rationale: the proposal to include a mandatory voting option to âAbstainâ failed to include Abstain. Furthermore, this proposal was derived from the DAOstewards ideation thread, thus deciding to abstain from voting.
eIP46: Increase default borrow factor to 0.5 from 0.28
vote: NO
Rationale: the proposal hasnât provided Enough information on the potential impact of the change. In our opinion, the author has to inform the DAO sufficiently on proposals like changing default parameters.
Title: eIP 45: Formalising Governance Processes
Vote: Yes
Implementing such changes aligns with our vision for the DAO
eIP 47 Promote rETH to collateral tier contingent on chainlink deploying a proper oracle
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Euler is currently the got to the marketplace to ETH LSD; adding rETH will only boot the looping cycle. This change will not have a huge impact on the overall stability of Euler protocol.
eIP 42 Delegating SAFE Airdrop
Vote: abstain
Rationale: Conflict of interests; DAOstewards are one of the candidates on the proposal to gain the SAFE delegation,